Radical transparency about what tactical allocation cannot promise: guaranteed outperformance, perfect signals, or immunity from behavioral mistakes. What it can offer is process over prediction.
Here's what I wish I could tell you: "Hire Caldric, and everything will work out perfectly." I wish I could promise that your portfolio will always go up, that we'll anticipate every market turn, and that you'll sleep soundly through every correction.
I can't promise any of that. And honestly, you should be suspicious of anyone who does.
What I can offer is something different—a systematic approach to managing risk, a framework for navigating economic regimes, and the honest acknowledgment that uncertainty is baked into the process. Carl Richards, a financial planner whose work I respect, put it plainly: "Trouble is, the real world is complicated: we don't know what's going to happen."
In that spirit, here are three things I genuinely wish I could guarantee—but can't.
1. I Can't Guarantee We'll Outperform in Every Period
Caldric will use a tactical allocation approach. When economic conditions favor risk assets, we'll be invested. When conditions deteriorate, we'll move defensive. This approach has historically reduced drawdowns during bear markets and captured much of the upside during recoveries.
But here's the tradeoff: during long, steady bull markets—the kind where everything just keeps going up—tactical allocation typically lags behind a simple buy-and-hold strategy. We'll be watching for threats that don't materialize. We'll occasionally step aside when we should have stayed in. We'll trail the S&P 500 while talking heads on television declare that passive investing has won forever.
This is by design, not a flaw. Howard Marks, who has been investing for over fifty years, admits: "I'm firmly convinced that markets will continue to rise and fall, and I think I know why. But I'm sure I'll never know when they're going to turn up or down, how far they'll go after they do, how fast they'll move, when they'll turn back toward the midpoint, or how far they'll continue on the opposite side."
If someone with Marks's track record acknowledges that uncertainty, I'd be foolish to claim otherwise. The goal isn't to beat the market every quarter or even every year. The goal is to build wealth over a full market cycle while avoiding the catastrophic losses that derail retirement plans.
During a raging bull market, that distinction can feel academic. It won't feel academic when the next bear market arrives.
2. I Can't Guarantee Every Signal Will Be Right
The regime framework Caldric will use—based on the direction of growth and inflation—provides a systematic way to identify favorable and unfavorable market environments. When conditions shift, the system responds. This removes emotion from the equation and replaces guesswork with process.
But "systematic" doesn't mean "infallible."
Economic data gets revised. Signals can whipsaw—flipping from bullish to bearish and back again in rapid succession, triggering trades that cost money without adding value. Regime transitions are messy in real time, even when they look clean in hindsight. Our internal research acknowledges this directly: the system may "miss some regime transitions" entirely.
This is where I need to be blunt. If you're looking for an approach that's right 100% of the time, you won't find it here—or anywhere. Gary Antonacci, whose momentum research has influenced how many advisors (including me) think about tactical allocation, is honest about the limitations: "It is not easy to beat the market. Very few investors do."
The advantage of a systematic approach isn't that it's always right. It's that it's consistently applied. It doesn't panic at the bottom or get greedy at the top. It follows rules rather than feelings. Over time, that discipline has tended to add value. But "tended to" is the honest phrase. Not "guaranteed to."
3. I Can't Guarantee You'll Stay the Course
This one might sting, but it's the most important.
The research is overwhelming: investor behavior destroys returns. The average stock fund returned roughly 10% annually over the past several decades. The average investor in those funds earned about 4%. That gap—what Carl Richards calls "the behavior gap"—comes from buying high, selling low, and abandoning strategies at precisely the wrong time.
Even the best investment approach in the world fails if you don't stick with it.
Daniel Crosby, a behavioral finance expert, observes that "sometimes doing the right thing does not guarantee a good result. It is precisely for this reason that probabilistically informed investing gets abandoned with regularity." In other words: good process, bad outcome, client panics, strategy gets dumped. It happens constantly.
Caldric's Flight Plan—the cash wedge, the income floor analysis, the investment blueprint—is specifically designed to address this. The structure exists to help you stay invested through the inevitable rough patches. But I can't force you to follow it. If the market drops 30% and you decide you can't take it anymore, you can leave. The decision is always yours.
Morgan Housel captures this tension perfectly: "Luck and risk are siblings. They are both the reality that every outcome in life is guided by forces other than individual effort." No matter how good your plan, forces outside your control will influence results. The best I can do is build a system that gives you the highest probability of success—and help you understand why abandoning it mid-crisis is historically the worst decision investors make.
What I Can Promise
I can promise process over prediction. A framework for thinking about risk that has academic support and practical logic behind it. Transparency about fees, methodology, and limitations. Regular communication when conditions change. And an honest acknowledgment that, as Richards puts it, "risk is what's left when you think you've thought of everything."
What I can't promise is certainty. No one can.
The advisors who promise certainty are either lying or don't understand what they're selling. The honest ones will tell you that investing involves risk, that good decisions can produce bad outcomes, and that the future is irreducibly uncertain. The job isn't to eliminate uncertainty—it's to navigate it with clear eyes and a sound process.
That's what Caldric will offer. Not guarantees. Just a thoughtful approach to a problem that doesn't have a perfect solution.
